Hi Martin,
> So for me NTFS is useless till we can do write with it.
Unfortunately, this is the case for some people.
For others read-only support is useful enough.
> When is it planned?
This is a difficult question. Read support is inherently easy.
You give the user anything you can understand.
Writing, however, is very difficult. NTFS is built like a database.
Every piece of information is stored in several places. If you make
even a simple change you have to know where to write the info.
For example when you rename a file, the name is stored in the MFT
(a large table). It is also stored in indexes (directories) which
are kept in alphabetical order. The indexes are kept in a balanced
b+ (binary) tree. If you change its position then you may need to
rebalance the whole tree. This is non-trivial.
This means that even the simplest _write_ operations quickly become
very difficult.
Answering your question: only easy bits of writing are supported.
This will change when Anton has time to code it (this is only his hobby)
or we get more help (hint :-).
> Read-only... Maybe that's why it's not in RedHat kernel.
Possibly, but rumours hint at another reason.
Cheers,
FlatCap (Rich)
nt...@fl...
|