Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I did a burst of work a few weeks back, and somehow missed it. I should be able to get to it soon (Monday is a holiday over here).
Status: open
Group: 3.2 development
Created: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC by Matthew Hambley
Last Updated: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I did a burst of work a few
weeks back, and somehow missed it. I should be able to get to it soon
(Monday is a holiday over here).
No problem. It will just save me the effort of editing the source each time a new version comes out.
Last edit: Matthew Hambley 2016-09-02
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I did a burst of work a few
weeks back, and somehow missed it. I should be able to get to it soon
(Monday is a holiday over here).
No problem. It will just save me the effort of editing the source each time a new version comes out.
What is exercising me at the moment is that robust running seems to be quite broken. I am in the process of changing how we build pFUnit so I suspect that is the cause, I just can't work out why.
I am getting failures and errors from every other test. They complain that "Incorrect start line in RemoteProxyTestCase.F90." When I print out the line it is true, they are either "LAUNCHED" or a test name completely at odds with the test being run.
The test works without issue in non-robust mode.
Any idea what might be going on here?
--
Matthew Hambley
Scientific Software Engineer
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
Status: open
Group: 3.2 development
Created: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC by Matthew Hambley
Last Updated: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:59 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
Just a quick reminder that this tiny patch has been sitting around for some months apparently unexamined.
Matthew,
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I did a burst of work a few weeks back, and somehow missed it. I should be able to get to it soon (Monday is a holiday over here).
Cheers,
On Sep 2, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Matthew Hambley matthewhambley@users.sf.netamp#109;amp#97;amp#116;amp#116;amp#104;amp#101;amp#119;amp#104;amp#97;amp#109;amp#98;amp#108;amp#101;amp#121;amp#64;amp#117;amp#115;amp#101;amp#114;amp#115;amp#46;amp#115;amp#102;amp#46;amp#110;amp#101;amp#116; wrote:
Just a quick reminder that this tiny patch has been sitting around for some months apparently unexamined.
[patches:#10]https://sourceforge.net/p/pfunit/patches/10/ Fixes for deferred strings
Status: open
Group: 3.2 development
Created: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC by Matthew Hambley
Last Updated: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
Attached is a patch against release v3.2.5 which should fix deferred string functionality.
Sent from sourceforge.nethttp://sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/pfunit/patches/10/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Thomas Clune, Ph.D.
Software Infrastructure Team Lead
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office
NASA GSFC
B33-C128
301-286-4635
Related
Patches: #10
From: Tom Clune [mailto:tom_clune@users.sf.net]
No problem. It will just save me the effort of editing the source each time a new version comes out.
Last edit: Matthew Hambley 2016-09-02
Yes - robust has me rather depressed as well. I’ve found that even the simple test of “sleep” is breaking some fraction of the time under linux.
It always works in my development environment, which makes it even harder.
OTOH, I’ve found that with the -debug command line option, I don’t miss the robust option all that much.
Cheers,
On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Matthew Hambley matthewhambley@users.sf.netamp#109;amp#97;amp#116;amp#116;amp#104;amp#101;amp#119;amp#104;amp#97;amp#109;amp#98;amp#108;amp#101;amp#121;amp#64;amp#117;amp#115;amp#101;amp#114;amp#115;amp#46;amp#115;amp#102;amp#46;amp#110;amp#101;amp#116; wrote:
From: Tom Clune [mailto:tom_clune@users.sf.net]
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I did a burst of work a few
weeks back, and somehow missed it. I should be able to get to it soon
(Monday is a holiday over here).
No problem. It will just save me the effort of editing the source each time a new version comes out.
What is exercising me at the moment is that robust running seems to be quite broken. I am in the process of changing how we build pFUnit so I suspect that is the cause, I just can't work out why.
I am getting failures and errors from every other test. They complain that "Incorrect start line in RemoteProxyTestCase.F90." When I print out the line it is true, they are either "LAUNCHED" or a test name completely at odds with the test being run.
The test works without issue in non-robust mode.
Any idea what might be going on here?
--
Matthew Hambley
Scientific Software Engineer
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
[patches:#10]https://sourceforge.net/p/pfunit/patches/10/ Fixes for deferred strings
Status: open
Group: 3.2 development
Created: Thu Jun 09, 2016 01:31 PM UTC by Matthew Hambley
Last Updated: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:59 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
Attachments:
Attached is a patch against release v3.2.5 which should fix deferred string functionality.
Sent from sourceforge.nethttp://sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/pfunit/patches/10/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Related
Patches: #10