l2tpd-devel Mailing List for L2TP client / daemon
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
dami0nd
Menu
▾
▴
l2tpd-devel — L2TPd developement discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(20) |
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
(2) |
8
(1) |
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Raffael H. <ra...@ra...> - 2006-02-08 01:39:05
|
Hi Damion, Damion de Soto <da...@cy...> wrote: > Check out and build a CVS version from sourceforge, and see if it resolves > anything. > Unfortunately we don't have a release version or binaries that contain the > changes yet. hooray. Works so far. :-) Thanks, raffi |
|
From: Damion de S. <da...@cy...> - 2006-02-07 05:29:08
|
Hi Raffael, > > i'm running into problems trying to connect a Windows XP SP2 > client with L2TPd running under MIPS (control messages get > confused). Same setup (well I guess so, but there's nothing obvious > different) works with x86. > > l2tpd version equals to 0.70-pre200311 (Debian unstable) > > I'm running out of ideas; could it be something missing in the Linux Kernel > (2.6.15), does l2tpd suffer from endianness problems? It shouldn't have any endianness problems, however it does suffer from some memory alignment issues which may be related to the problems on your platform. Check out and build a CVS version from sourceforge, and see if it resolves anything. Unfortunately we don't have a release version or binaries that contain the changes yet. Regards, -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Damion de Soto -------------------------------------------------- | Software Engineer email: Dam...@au... | Secure Computing Corporation web: http://www.securecomputing.com | fax: +61 7 3891 3630 ph: +61 7 3435 2809 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---- Free Embedded Linux Distro at http://www.snapgear.org ---- |
|
From: Raffael H. <ra...@ra...> - 2006-02-07 00:51:35
|
Hi there,
i'm running into problems trying to connect a Windows XP SP2
client with L2TPd running under MIPS (control messages get
confused). Same setup (well I guess so, but there's nothing obvious
different) works with x86.
l2tpd version equals to 0.70-pre200311 (Debian unstable)
Config file
===========
[global]
port = 1701
[lns default]
ip range = 192.168.0.10 - 192.168.254.254
local ip = 192.168.0.9
;require chap = yes
;refuse pap = yes
require authentication = yes
hostname = Raffi's VPN Server
ppp debug = yes
pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.l2tpd
length bit = yes
x86 log
=======
Feb 7 01:09:26 localhost l2tpd[2035]: bearer_type_avp: peer bears: analog
Feb 7 01:09:26 localhost l2tpd[2035]: check_control: control, cid = 0, Ns = 3, Nr = 1
Feb 7 01:09:26 localhost l2tpd[2035]: check_control: control, cid = 1, Ns = 3, Nr = 2
Feb 7 01:09:26 localhost l2tpd[2035]: handle_avps: handling avp's for tunnel 55437, call 43801
mips log (don't mind the date)
========
Jan 1 00:53:01 nina l2tpd[1150]: check_control: control, cid = 0, Ns = 3, Nr = 1
Jan 1 00:53:01 nina l2tpd[1150]: check_control: control, cid = 0, Ns = 4, Nr = 2
Jan 1 00:53:01 nina l2tpd[1150]: check_control: Received out of order control packet on tunnel
10 (got 4, expected 3)
Jan 1 00:53:01 nina l2tpd[1150]: handle_packet: bad control packet!
I'm running out of ideas; could it be something missing in the Linux Kernel
(2.6.15), does l2tpd suffer from endianness problems?
best regards,
Raffael Himmelreich
|
