Francesco Lannutti

Hi Brian, thx a lot! :) Fra

Hi Dietmar, I saw the commits. They look ok to me. You respected the rule: each node has to be mentioned in the binding part, respecting the same if statements, if any! Thank you, Fra

Hi Dietmar, ok! Then it could be normal. Maybe the other models don't need additional nodes? BTW, did you create also the REAL to COMPLEX and viceversa parts? BTW2, if your code works, you can commit, to me! :) Thank you, Fra

Hi Dietmar, do you mean this code is what is missing or should I have a look at the problem? Consider that maybe the self-heating was not part of the SETUP function when the binding was created and that's why in missing. On the fact that the result is the same even without this binding is something we need to understand. Are you sure the feature is utilized properly, for example? Also, if I have to look at this, do you have a small testcase? Thank you, Fra

Cool ! :) I leave you guys decide what to do next! ;) Fra

Ok! It was a good debugging anyway! :) Let's see what Holger decides to do! Fra

OMG... Then we have a bug in BISON, or at least in the Debian version... Did I get this right? Also, about Makefile.am changes, it was required to me to have parser.h/c style instead of parser.tab.h/c style. Ofc one can modify the source code file where those are called without touching that Makefile.am line, but something is necessary due to the default name being .tab.h/c in my case. Isn't it your case as well ??? Thank you, Fra

One more thing about the patch itself, which doesn't apply correctly. Which branch are you using? BTW, I started from your work, but that part should be incorporated anyway in my file. Thank you, Fra