fun4j Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars

★★★★★

★★★★

★★★

★★

★

ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

Rate This Project

User Reviews

Filter Reviews:

All

thma Posted 2011-11-07

"I've read the tutorial about the functional assembler and I was wondering if it was possible to build an implementation for a typed functional language." Yes, that should be possible. Have a look at org.fun4j.Template and the respective testcases in test.org.fun4j.TemplateTest. The higher order functions support for Java Collections etc. is completely typed. cheers, Thomas
oid-3517051 Posted 2011-08-20

I've just discovered fun4j and I like it a lot. I think it's very useful. I've read the tutorial about the functional assembler and I was wondering if it was possible to build an implementation for a typed functional language. Greetings and congratulations!!!!
magicprinc Posted 2011-01-06

very good idea. If you can't use clojure, but want more fp than pure java allows.