Description: On Mac OS 10.6.8, after updating from TeX Live 2012 (MacTeX 2012) to TeX Live 2013 (MacTeX 2013), I’ve encountered several issues with some AAT features. I’ve encountered all of them with swashes, but I have no doubt some can be triggered with other features.
aat-info.tex.I don’t know if these issue are linked or not. Feel free to split them up as you see fit.
Nota:
I’m certainly wrong about the results I expect from time to time, I’m a complete XeTeX and AAT newbie.
Context:
Preliminaries:
The files listed below are all enclosed in the archive.tar.bz2. The following expects the archive to be untared into /Users/John/Public.
Structure of the archive
The archive contains the following directories:
aat-info.*.pdf typeset by myself, for reference:aat-info.chancery.2012.en.pdf is aat-info.tex set to Apple Chancery, typeset by John with xetex2012aat-info.chancery.2012.fr.pdf by François with xetex2012aat-info.chancery.2013.en.pdf by John with xetex2013aat-info.chancery.2013.fr.pdf by François with xetex2013 (this is the interesting one)For convenience, files named copy-paste-me.{fr,en}.sh are provided with the shell command to copy paste into a terminal, not to be run directly.
Steps to reproduce:
cd /Users/John/Public/archiveline-swashesalias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexalias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexxetex2012 --job line-swashes.2012 line-swashes.tex which generates line-swashes.2012.log and line-swashes.2012.pdfxetex2013 --job line-swashes.2013 line-swashes.tex which generates line-swashes.2013.log and line-swashes.2013.pdfActual results
line-swashes.2012.pdf displays (twice, once for defaults, once for explicit features):line-swashes.2013.pdf displays:Expected results
Both line-swashes.2012.pdf and line-swashes.2013.pdf display, twice:
* Line Initial Swashes (You)
* Line Final Swashes (there)
* [unsure] No swash in the middle of a line (I saw, You saw)
Steps to reproduce issue 2:
cd /Users/John/Public/archivelanguage-depalias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexalias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexxetex2012 --job language-dep.2012.en language-dep.tex which generates language-dep.2012.en.log and language-dep.2012.en.pdfxetex2013 --job language-dep.2013.en language-dep.tex which generates language-dep.2013.en.log and language-dep.2013.en.pdfcd /Users/John/Public/archivelanguage-depalias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexalias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetexxetex2012 --job language-dep.2012.fr language-dep.tex which generates language-dep.2012.fr.log and language-dep.2012.fr.pdfxetex2013 --job language-dep.2013.fr language-dep.tex which generates language-dep.2013.fr.log and language-dep.2013.fr.pdfActual results:
The archive contains the results I obtain on my part.
language-dep.fr.2013.log complain about `Parafes=Parafes en fin de mot'language-dep.fr.2013.log complains about `Smart Swashes=Word Final Swashes'language-dep.2012.{fr,en}.pdf both look the same:language-dep.2013.{fr,en}.pdf look different but share:Expected results:
language-dep.2013.fr.pdf and language-dep.2013.en.pdf are identicallanguage-dep.2013.{fr,en}.pdf have:
Anonymous
This still happens on OS X 10.9.0.
I cannot test this on a Mac. On Linux, it should be noted that extracting the archive requires unusual options:
$ tar --delay-directory-restore -xvjf archive.tar.bz2. I cannot reproduce anything else. To debug this further on non-Mac, please provide us with a URL to downloadApple Chanceryfrom, and if some font file renaming is needed, please say what to rename and how.Last edit: Just A. Man 2020-07-13
I’ll try to reproduce on my curernt setup, but that probably won't be before this week end or the next. As for making the font available for download, I’ll have to check the licence, but I’m guessing that will be complicated. If I’m able to reproduce, I’ll probably need to find another font that is concerned as well.