Need clarification on spec. Is it only the name of the view
that should be unchangeable, or should all fields be
uneditable? The original view allows changing all of the
fields including threshold and the member varieties.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Each collection has a default view called "Original." That view
cannot be deleted, and its name cannot be changed. I
recommend that working views be derived from it; but it's also
possible (and in the case of imports from WordSurv,
necessary because they usually come in already annotated)
to use it as a working view as well. So the fields in the view
are editable; only the name is not. The specification that view
names in a collection must be unique prevents duplicate
name already. And the Original view itself cannot be removed.
Sorry for the terse reply to a question that really had several
parts.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
These fixes take into account the prospect of future
localization of WordCorr. Thus, the Original view will
always be named as "Original" in the database/xml exports,
but when displayed to the user, "Original" may be a
localized string.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=618259
The specs were to make it unchangeable.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1050693
Still a problem in WordCorr 2.
Need clarification on spec. Is it only the name of the view
that should be unchangeable, or should all fields be
uneditable? The original view allows changing all of the
fields including threshold and the member varieties.
Logged In: YES
user_id=618259
Each collection has a default view called "Original." That view
cannot be deleted, and its name cannot be changed. I
recommend that working views be derived from it; but it's also
possible (and in the case of imports from WordSurv,
necessary because they usually come in already annotated)
to use it as a working view as well. So the fields in the view
are editable; only the name is not. The specification that view
names in a collection must be unique prevents duplicate
name already. And the Original view itself cannot be removed.
Sorry for the terse reply to a question that really had several
parts.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1050693
fixed in CVS for 2.1.0 branch.
These fixes take into account the prospect of future
localization of WordCorr. Thus, the Original view will
always be named as "Original" in the database/xml exports,
but when displayed to the user, "Original" may be a
localized string.