Re: [Sbcl-devel] generic (in the CLOS sense :) sequences

[Christophe R. <cs...@ca...>]

Matthew D Swank <ak...@ch...> writes:

> Not being that familiar the the testing framework, I'm not sure how to
> isolate  "Unhandled error      compiler.pure.lisp" any further.

Ah, thank you.  I know why that's happening; the compiler.pure.lisp
framework tests to see that sequence functions don't cause spurious
warnings: but SORT is inlined, and calls an as-yet undefined function
(SEQUENCE-SORT), so generates a style warning.  That'll be fixed
naturally when the stuff from the sequences.tar.gz tarball is
integrated.

Thank you!  (Now see if you can write useful sequence code ;-)

Cheers,

Christophe