#3 Oberon incorrectly counted nil for Bing

[Anonymous]

I see that the count from Bing for Oberon language is 0, which certainly can't be correct as even Bing isn't that dumb.

Upon closer inspection, your search query is [sic] +"Oberon programming" , but I suspect it would be better to use [sic] +Oberon +programming [253,500 results] or [sic] +Oberon +compiler [56,100 results] or some similar combination. Even just [sic] "Oberon compiler" gives 10,200 results. So this is quite a difference from zero! However, it seems that [sic] Oberon programming compiler [97,400 results] differs from [sic] Oberon compiler programming [46,900 results], even without quotation marks.

So I dunno, it's a mess, but you may wish to be ultra careful and/or change a few things! (Nice job so far, though.)

[Gautier de Montmollin]

Hello,
As you've guessed, one needs to be very careful about changing rules.
And: the same rules apply to all languages queried, not only the one(s) you would like to see more hits for.
Some engines, including Bing, allow for a 1-year filter, which is applied.
There were 0 hits certainly for that reason; on Jan 1st there were 63, now 38.
Actually, if you click on the Oberon / Bing cell with the hit number, you get the exact query.
Cheers
Gautier