RE: [L2tpd-devel] CVS commits today

[Scott B. <sb...@ig...>]

Unfortunately commenting out the RWS handler creates major hell when
connecting with Redbank routers (ahem...). Notice that the RWS reported for
such a connection is -1. ;) The call completes and PPPd fires up. But final
PPP negotiations can never be completed because every received packet is
treated as an invalid payload.

I'll put this on one of the more critical areas to try and patch up. Until
then, I think we may have to revert back to the old diff for a little bit.
:/

--Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: l2t...@li...
[mailto:l2t...@li...]On Behalf Of Jeff
Mcadams
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:51 PM
To: l2t...@li...
Subject: [L2tpd-devel] CVS commits today


Did some CVS commits today...

Was working with an acquaintance on getting l2tpd connecting to a Cisco
3000 (formerly Altiga I believe) VPN concentrator.  The 3000 is fairly
anal about its protocol processing which revealed some errors in our
handling of the l2tp protocol...mainly sending avps in control messages
where they are invalid.

I *think* we've found all the ones that cause interoperability problems
with the Cisco 3000...but I'm pretty sure there are more out there, so I
added one or two things to the TODO file referencing the need to find
and fix other similar problems.

I'll do an audit at some point of what AVPs we send at various times in
various control packets and make sure, at least, that they're all valid.
I'd also like to confirm that the values that we send make sense in
them, but that's rather a more significant thing to audit.
--
Jeff McAdams                            Email: je...@ig...
Head Network Administrator              Voice: (502) 966-3848
IgLou Internet Services                        (800) 436-4456

_______________________________________________
L2tpd-devel mailing list
L2t...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l2tpd-devel