From: Kara D. <ka...@ge...> - 2005-03-23 16:04:19
|
Looks great to me, and I like the B_name idea (vs. Binomial_name). Less tricky typing is good. One suggestion on the doc, from a previous point on this thread: we might want to explicitly have a note for MODs that do not yet provide all file types, something like: If your MOD does not yet provide a particular file type in this specification, then the URL for the unsupported file type should return a 404 Not Found (or text that states "This file is not yet available for this MOD" or whatever behavior people think is most useful).... I think this will be a common question that will come up. On Mar 23, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Lincoln Stein wrote: > Ok, how does this look as the basis for a document that we can post at > the Sequence Ontology and/or GMOD web sites? > > Lincoln > > -- > Lincoln D. Stein > Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory > 1 Bungtown Road > Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 > > NOTE: Please copy Sandra Michelsen <mic...@cs...> on > all emails regarding scheduling and other time-critical topics. > <standard_urls.txt> |