Re: [Bluemusic-users] (no subject)

[Steven Yi <ste...@gm...>]

Well, the java wrapper to the API is not as fully featured as the full
API, so there are still things barring the usefulness of integrating
Csound via API with blue.  But this definitely is an area worth
looking into for further development!

steven


On 10/4/05, Pei...@ao... <Pei...@ao...> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Thanks for your replay. I have to say that I don't have much knowledge of=
 programming and therefore have no idea what "pipes" are! But I can appreci=
ate the problem because k-rate controllers in Cecilia also do not work in w=
inxp; due I believe to the same thing.
>
> Csoundapi~ seems to be the only true real-time version of csound that wor=
ks on all platforms, but in a way it is a pity that it relies on pd. Althou=
gh good for pd users still it would be great to have everything in one plac=
e I think (as in SC). I personally think that it would be nice to have the =
option of using blue with csoundapi~ for real-time purposes. Users will sti=
ll have a choice as to which distribution to use for non real-time control.=
 Particularly now that api is distributed with Csound5 it may be a nice ide=
a!
>
> Anyway I have hardly any technical knowledge to be suggesting such an ide=
a; it is only from a purely practical point of view related to my own compo=
sitional activities.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Peiman
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Bluemusic-users mailing list
> Blu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluemusic-users
>