Re: [Bastille-linux-discuss] Probs with 2.1.4-0.1

[Jay B. <ja...@ba...>]

I'll test on Fedora Core later today and see if I can track down problems.

BTW, anyone looking to modify Questions.txt should be very careful -- 
the development trunk of Bastille is deprecating Questions.txt in favor 
of Questions/<modulename>.txt files....

More later today.

  - Jay

craig needs wrote:
> I checked the /usr/share/Bastille/Questions.txt file and I noticed that
> most of the REQUIRE_DISTRO settings are LINUX DB SE TB OSX. I can put
> FC2 or RHFC2 in without a problem the trick is knowing which of the
> questions are applicable to Fedora Core. I figure I don't need much of
> the stuff at the start of the file because it seems to be pertaining to
> HP-UX. I was thinking of adding FC2 to anything that had LINUX in its
> distro. Is this a decent assumption or am I going to screw things up?
> Does anyone know which questions are pertinent for FC2?
> 
> Thanks
> Craig
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 14:00, Niki Rahimi wrote:
> 
>>Craig,
>>        Take a look at Questions.txt. I had similar problems with SuSE
>>on this and I'm pretty
>>sure it was that the Questions.txt file where the REQUIRE_DISTRO:
>>..... must have the FC2
>>set up for each applicable Question. I'm not as familiar with the
>>development history on Fedora
>>so can't be sure about what's been set up on older versions, but I'm
>>thinking updating that file
>>will do the trick.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Niki
>>
>>Niki A. Rahimi
>>LTC Security Development
>>nar...@us...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>craig needs
>><cn...@ch...>
>>Sent by:
>>bas...@li...
>>
>>10/26/2004 10:00 PM
>>Please respond to
>>cneeds
>>        
>>        To:      
>>bas...@li...
>>        cc:        
>>        Subject:      
>>[Bastille-linux-discuss] Probs with 2.1.4-0.1
>>
>>
>>Hi Everyone
>>I have a Fedora Core 2 machine which has been running
>>an earlier version of bastille ok from the RedHat 9
>>upgrade that I did on it. I have now downloaded and
>>tried installing numerous versions of the later
>>Bastille 2.1.3-0.2 and 2.1.4-0.1. I am running
>>perl-Tk-804.027. The 2.1.3 version came up with the
>>API.pm syntax errors that were mentioned in the sourceforge
>>bug list which I fixed by inserting the missing }. But when
>>running bastille I got "Bastille is unable to run on
>>this operating system". So I did the bastille --os and
>>found it was expecting FC2 not RHFC2. Tried bastille
>>--os FC2. Same error "Bastille is unable to run on this
>>operating system". Ok I'll try 2.1.4-0.1. Installed ok
>>and when I run bastille it fires up the TK interface ok
>>but there are no modules to choose from. I get title
>>screen and end screen. I can save and exit ok but then
>>of course there is no useful config generated. Is there anyone
>>that has a working config on FC2.
>>
>>Thanks for any hints
>>Craig N
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>>Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
>>LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>bastille-linux-discuss mailing list
>>bas...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bastille-linux-discuss
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> bastille-linux-discuss mailing list
> bas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bastille-linux-discuss