Browse free open source MCP Clients and projects below. Use the toggles on the left to filter open source MCP Clients by OS, license, language, programming language, and project status.
Free and source-available fair-code licensed workflow automation tool
Witsy: desktop AI assistant
ChatMCP is an AI chat client implementing the Model Context Protocol
Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports for multiple LLMs
Just a Better Chatbot. Powered by MCP Client & Workflows
A smart assistant that connects powerful AI to your personal world
5ire is a cross-platform desktop AI assistant, MCP client
A desktop MCP client designed as a tool unitary utility integration
Arcade Tool Development Kit (TDK), Worker, Evals, and CLI
A solution to build and deploy MCP agents and applications
Open Source MCP integration for AI applications
An MCP client for Neovim that seamlessly integrates MCP servers
Postman for MCPs - A tool for testing and debugging MCPs
The Simple Agent Development Kit
The AI toolkit for the AI developer
Dive is an open-source MCP Host Desktop Application
Open Source Generic MCP Client for testing & evaluating mcp servers
A framework helps you quickly build Cloud or Desktop IDE products
Advanced Full Text Search + AI Assistant
Open source MCP (Model Context Protocol) clients are community-developed software tools that interact with MCP servers, enabling data exchange and communication between applications, models, and other services. Being open source means their source code is publicly available, allowing developers to review, modify, and enhance the software to meet their specific needs. These clients typically follow the MCP specification to ensure compatibility with servers and can be implemented in various programming languages, making them adaptable to different technical environments.
One of the key advantages of open source MCP clients is their flexibility. Developers can customize the client to support unique workflows, integrate with proprietary systems, or add new features that are not part of the default implementation. Because the code is transparent, security-conscious organizations can audit it for vulnerabilities and maintain control over data handling. The collaborative nature of open source development also means that improvements, bug fixes, and optimizations contributed by the community are rapidly shared and adopted.
In practice, open source MCP clients often serve as essential building blocks for applications that need to communicate with AI models, APIs, or other data services in a standardized way. They can range from lightweight command-line utilities to fully featured frameworks that handle complex connection management, authentication, and data transformation. Their open and extensible design fosters innovation, as both individuals and organizations can tailor the client’s capabilities to fit evolving requirements without being locked into a single vendor’s ecosystem.
Open source MCP (Model Context Protocol) clients are typically free to use in terms of licensing costs. Since the software is released under open source licenses, anyone can download, install, and modify it without paying upfront fees. However, the actual cost of using an open source MCP client can vary depending on how it’s deployed. If you’re self-hosting, there may be expenses related to infrastructure, such as server hosting, bandwidth, and storage. Additionally, organizations often need to account for labor costs—time spent by developers or IT staff to configure, customize, secure, and maintain the system. These indirect costs can sometimes exceed the price of commercial software, even if the software itself is free.
Beyond infrastructure and labor, there may be costs associated with integrating the MCP client into an existing technology stack. This can involve custom development, testing, and training for team members to use the tool effectively. Some organizations also invest in support contracts, consulting services, or premium add-ons from third parties to ensure stability and performance. While open source MCP clients remove the barrier of licensing fees, the total cost of ownership depends heavily on the organization’s technical expertise, scalability requirements, and the complexity of the intended use case.
Open source MCP (Model Context Protocol) clients can integrate with a variety of software types, provided the software can communicate using the MCP specification or be wrapped with an adapter that does. One major category is developer tools, such as integrated development environments and code editors, where MCP clients can connect to servers that provide features like code completion, refactoring, and static analysis.
Another category is data platforms and databases, which can expose query and schema information through MCP-compatible endpoints, allowing an MCP client to explore, query, or analyze structured data directly. Workflow automation tools also fit well, enabling MCP clients to interact with systems for scheduling, task management, or orchestration of processes. In addition, knowledge management and documentation systems can integrate by making their search and retrieval functions available through MCP, so an MCP client can retrieve context or reference materials. Even specialized domain applications, such as design tools, scientific computing platforms, or customer support systems, can integrate if they offer MCP-ready interfaces or can be adapted to do so. Essentially, any software that can expose its capabilities, data, or actions over a protocol-compliant API can be integrated with an open source MCP client.
Choosing the right open source MCP client starts with matching the client’s form factor and feature set to the way you work. If your main workflow lives inside an IDE, a mature choice is Continue, an open source assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that implements the full MCP surface—tools, prompts, resources, and multiple transport types—so you can wire in local or remote servers without leaving your editor. Its docs spell out support for stdio, SSE, and streamable-HTTP transports as well as secret handling, which matters if you expect to call hosted services or rotate API keys regularly.
If you want a simple way to poke at servers, reproduce bugs, or demo tools for teammates, a lightweight, generic client is ideal. The mcp-chat CLI and web UI are open source and designed specifically for testing and evaluating MCP servers; they let you spin up a chat, attach any server command, and see tool call arguments and outputs directly in the transcript, which is great for debugging server behavior.
Developers who prefer a desktop or multi-model chat app can look to community client roundups and the official MCP clients page to see what’s active, cross-platform, and permissively licensed. Those directories highlight a range of open source clients—from editor-integrated agents like Continue to desktop apps such as Tome and frameworks that expose MCP tools—so you can compare maintenance cadence, OS support, and licensing at a glance before you commit.
If your use case is terminals, automation, or scripting, consider CLI-first clients. The Amazon Q CLI is open source and advertises full MCP server support, which makes it a good fit when you want MCP tools available in shell workflows and CI. For bridging multiple LLM back ends to MCP servers from scripts, projects like Dolphin-MCP provide a Pythonic path and emphasize multi-server connectivity.
Security and ergonomics should be part of the pick. Look for permission prompts on potentially dangerous actions, clear logging, and easy configuration of local servers. The MCP quickstart for Claude’s desktop app shows the pattern many clients follow: local servers with explicit user approval for actions, human-readable config files, and log files for troubleshooting. Even if you don’t use Claude Desktop specifically, those behaviors are useful benchmarks when you evaluate other clients.
Finally, confirm the project’s health and ecosystem fit. MCP is an open protocol with official SDKs in multiple languages, so a healthy client will track protocol updates and interop well with servers you care about. Check the client’s release activity, transport coverage, and how quickly it adopts new MCP features like progress reporting or advanced resource types.
In short, choose an IDE-native client like Continue when coding is the center of gravity, a generic tester like mcp-chat when you need to validate servers, a CLI-first option when you automate, and a desktop chat app when you want a broader assistant experience. Then filter by transport support, secret management, consent and logging, license, OS coverage, and maintenance signals to land on the right open source fit for your stack.